Federal Communications Commission DA 13-987
 Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
Review of the Emergency Alert System;
Independent Spanish Broadcasters Association, the Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ, Inc., and the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council, Petition for Immediate Relief;
Randy Gehman Petition for Rulemaking
|
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
|
EB Docket No. 04-296
|
ORDER
Adopted: May 2, 2013 Released: May 2, 2013
By the Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau:
I. Introduction
In this Order we address fifteen petitions submitted on behalf of various radio and television broadcaster and cable Emergency Alert System (EAS) Participants seeking to withdraw previously filed requests for waiver of Section 11.56 of the Commission’s rules,1 which requires EAS Participants to have installed operational equipment that can receive and process EAS alerts in the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) by June 30, 2012.2 For the reasons set out herein, we grant the petitions to withdraw the waiver requests, and dismiss the underlying waiver petitions.
II. Background
In its 2007 EAS Second Report and Order, the Commission, among other things, mandated that EAS Participants be able to receive a CAP-formatted EAS alert message issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) no later than 180 days after FEMA adopted technical standards for CAP.3 On September 30, 2010, FEMA published the technical standards and requirements for CAP-formatted EAS alerts, triggering the 180-day clock for EAS Participants to be able to receive CAP-formatted alerts.4 On November 18, 2010, the Commission adopted the Waiver Order, which extended the 180-day deadline for EAS Participants to meet the CAP-related obligations it adopted in the Second Report and Order until September 30, 2011.5 Finally, on September 16, 2011 the Commission extended the deadline one last time, amending section 11.56 of the Commission's EAS rules to require EAS Participants to be able to receive CAP-formatted EAS alerts as required by Part 11 no later than June 30, 2012.6
Opus Broadcasting Systems, Inc. (Opus), Valley Public Television, Inc. (Valley), Uno Radio Group (Uno), Windstream Lakedale, Inc., (Windstream), Venite Adroemus, Inc. (Venite), Pene Broadcasting Co., Inc. (Pene), Americus Communications, LLC and RLM Communications, Inc. (jointly Americus), Port St. Lucie Broadcasters, Inc. (Port St. Lucie), West Central Minnesota Educational TV Corp. (Pioneer), Baja Broadband Operating Company, LLC (Baja), Southern Communications Volunteers, Inc. (SCV), and Applegate Media, Inc. (Applegate) filed petitions seeking temporary waiver of section 11.56 on the basis that they could not meet the June 30 deadline due to vendor delay.7 ION Media Wassau License, Inc. (ION) filed a petition for temporary waiver of section 11.56, claiming that it could not obtain broadband connections necessary to comply with the CAP requirement.8 Blanchard Cable, Inc. (Blanchard) filed a request for temporary waiver of section 11.56 on the basis that compliance would be cost-prohibitive.9 MetroCast Communications of Mississippi, LLC (MetroCast) filed a petition for temporary waiver of section 11.56 on the basis that it was interconnecting two affected systems into a CAP-compliant system and this would not take place before the June 30 deadline.10 Caballero Acquisition, Inc. (Caballero) sought temporary waiver of section 11.56 on the basis that its newly purchased, CAP-compliant equipment had been stolen prior to installation.11 Rainbow Communications, Inc. (Rainbow) sought temporary waiver of section 11.56 on the basis that it planned to shut down the systems at issue by the end of 2012.12 Subsequently, Opus, Valley, Uno, Windstream, Venite, Pene, Americus, Port St. Lucie, Pioneer, Baja, ION, Blanchard, MetroCast, Caballero, and Rainbow filed requests seeking to withdraw their waiver petitions.13
III. Discussion
These fifteen petitioners all state that they are now either in compliance with section 11.56 of the Commission’s rules or are no longer in operation.14 We find no reason to deny their withdrawal petitions and, accordingly, grant them. In granting these requests, we do not address the merits of any of the substantive issues raised in these EAS Participants’ original requests for waiver.
IV. Ordering Clauses
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Sections 1.3 and 1.8 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 1.8, the Withdrawal Petitions and Amended Withdrawal Petitions of Opus Broadcasting Systems, Inc.; Valley Public Television, Inc.; Uno Radio Group; Windstream Lakedale, Inc.; Venite Adoremus, Inc.; Pene Broadcasting Co., Inc.; Americus Communications, LLC; RLM Communications, Inc.; Port St. Lucie Broadcasters, Inc.; West Central Minnesota Educational TV Corp.; Baja Broadband Operating Company, LLC; ION Media Wassau License, Inc.; Blanchard Cable, Inc.; MetroCast Communications of Mississippi, LLC; Caballero Acquisition, Inc.; and Rainbow Communications, Inc., ARE GRANTED; and,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petitions for Waiver of section 47 CFR § 11.56 filed by Opus Broadcasting Systems, Inc.; Valley Public Television, Inc.; Uno Radio Group; Windstream Lakedale, Inc.; Venite Adoremus, Inc.; Pene Broadcasting Co., Inc.; Americus Communications, LLC; RLM Communications, Inc.; Port St. Lucie Broadcasters, Inc.; West Central Minnesota Educational TV Corp.; Baja Broadband Operating Company, LLC; ION Media Wassau License, Inc.; Blanchard Cable, Inc.; MetroCast Communications of Mississippi, LLC; Caballero Acquisition, Inc.; and Rainbow Communications, Inc., ARE DISMISSED.
This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.191, 0.392.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
David Turetsky
Chief
Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
Share with your friends: |